Analytical Hierarchy Process

Analytical Hierarchy Process

Length: 1192 words (3.4 double-spaced pages)

Rating: Excellent

Open Document

Essay Preview

More ↓
Analytical Hierarchy Process

Because people choose these three elements: importance, preference and likelihood to evaluate all the possible alternatives to a decision which sometimes is not consistent with every decision situation, the concept of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) was developed by Dr. Thomas Saaty. Dr. Saaty described the AHP as a decision making approach based on the "innate human ability to make sound judgments about small problems"
AHP transforms complex decision problems into simple decisions for both individuals and groups that employees the use of it to make decision. It is accommodative of intuition, compromise, and consensus structure without narrow-mindedness. The main purpose of this paper is to discuss what the AHP is and some other aspects of it.

What is AHP?
Saaty suggested AHP as a process that requires structuring the decision problem to demonstrate key elements and relationships that elicits judgments reflecting feelings or emotions, and whose judgments can be represented by meaningful numbers having ratio properties. In the AHP approach, complex decisions are organized and assessed against all possible alternatives using a hierarchy of multifaceted objectives allowing for a better, easier, and more efficient identification of selection criteria.

How AHP works
AHP is used to first decompose the decision problem into a hierarchy of easily comprehended sub-problems, each of which can be analyzed independently. The elements of the hierarchy can relate to any aspect of the decision problem tangible or intangible, estimated or carefully measured, well or poorly understood.
Once that hierarchy is established, the decision maker systematically examines the various elements, comparing them to each other in pairs. In making the comparisons, the decision maker can use his/her judgments about the elements’ relative meaning and importance, or they can use well refined data about the elements.
AHP converts the judgments to numerical values that are processed, evaluated and compared over the entire range of the decision problem. A numerical weight or priority vector is derived for each element of the hierarchy, allowing diverse and often incommensurable elements to be compared to one another in a rational and consistent way. This capability distinguishes AHP from other decision making techniques.
At the end of the process, numerical priorities are derived for each of the decision alternatives. It is then a simple matter to pick the best alternative, or to rank them in order of relative preference.

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Analytical Hierarchy Process." 18 Jan 2019

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

Business Intelligence Systems in the Decision Making Process Essay

- The most common purpose for (BI) systems is to aid in the decision making process. BI systems collect data, store the gathered information in data warehouses, analyze the data and then present the data in easy to understand applications for the decision making process. The following studies research the role that BI systems play in the decision making process. The Role of BI in Decision Making Overview. Isik, Jones, and Sidorova (2013) conducted a study that explored the following research questions “(1) What is the relationship between various BI capabilities and BI success....   [tags: business intelligence, decision ]

Research Papers
1814 words (5.2 pages)

Decision Making Process With Integration Of Personal Experience Essay

- Decision-making processes Three distinct decision making processes are programed decisions, operations research, and non-programed decisions (Dunn, 2010). Programed decisions are those made routinely and are well-known to the person making the decision (Dunn, 2010). Often these issues have standard rules and regulations that encompass them (Dunn, 2010). As stated by Dunn (2010), “operations research is closely aligned with systems analysis and is defined as the use of mathematical models, analytical methods, or structured inquiry to analyze a complex situation and identify the optimal approach” (p....   [tags: Decision making, Decision theory]

Research Papers
1404 words (4 pages)

Essay on The Maslow 's Hierarchy Theory

- Sasson (2015) states the inner power that pushes one toward taking action and toward achievement describes motivation. Also, motivation influences the aspiration and ambition to complete a mission. Chand (2015) report the process of motivation began with a deficiency in a physiological, or the psychological state that activates a behavior or a drive that aims at a goal or an accomplishment. Thus, internal motivation may be presented with the results of external actions. As stated by Chand (2015) motivation comes from the word motive that stimulates the movement of behavior....   [tags: Maslow's hierarchy of needs, Motivation]

Research Papers
774 words (2.2 pages)

Essay on Maslow 's Hierarchy Of Needs

- Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs in My Life Sometimes it is hard to see change, at least up close. I forget how much I have changed in my life until I look at a picture of myself in middle school or I run into an old friend I haven’t seen in a while. My point is that sometimes I wonder if I am doing what I am supposed to be doing in my life and that I am reaching or at least close to reaching my full potential as a person. This would be considered a motivator in Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. In one of my college classes, we were supposed to write about how we can inspire motivation in ourselves....   [tags: Maslow's hierarchy of needs, Motivation]

Research Papers
833 words (2.4 pages)

The Importance Of Maslow 's Hierarchy Of Needs Essay

- ... Motivation is a major management concept, with a large variety of theories that can be applied to induce greater levels of employee motivation within an organisation. They are categorised into two different perspectives, process theories and content theories. Process theories ‘explain how employees select behaviours with which to meet their needs and determine whether their choices were successful’ (Samson, 2009) and content theories ‘emphasise the needs that motivate people’ (Samson, 2009)....   [tags: Maslow's hierarchy of needs, Motivation]

Research Papers
1070 words (3.1 pages)

Essay about Maslow 's Theory Of Hierarchy Of Needs

- Debate # 1D Topic: The world has changed so much that Maslow 's theory of hierarchy of needs is a theory that no longer applies to today 's consumer behaviour. (PRO) Rebuttal We will begin our rebuttal using the main points Group 8 has stated in their opening arguments as subtitles. Physiological When asked “has human nature ever changed in history?” Group 8 responded that human nature has not ever changed in history. Human nature has in fact changed and evolved over the course of thousands of years....   [tags: Maslow's hierarchy of needs, Psychology]

Research Papers
889 words (2.5 pages)

Theory Of Needs And Maslow 's Hierarchy Essay

- ... In appreciation of the employee’s loyal service, TE provides a catalog via the mail and the employee is allowed to select a gift of their liking. Finally, TE offers the STAR Award program, which stands for Special Thanks And Recognition. This program is non-monetary driven and can be given by any TE employee to another co-worker to recognize an extraordinary customer experience. The accepting employee receives a certificate and the employee’s manager is made aware of the recognition. It is also customary for the employee to print the certificate and hang it at their workstation, as well as the manager is expected to recognize the employee for their achievement during routine staff meetin...   [tags: Maslow's hierarchy of needs, Motivation]

Research Papers
1057 words (3 pages)

The Concept Of Maslow 's Hierarchy Of Needs Essay

- To help guide the motivation practices of Toyota we will look at the concept of Maslow’s Hierarchy of needs, which is basic levels of needs. First is the lowest level, which is physiological, the next is safety, fulfillment, then self-assurance, and the last is self-actualization. Only when the first two levels are being meet, then employees can achieve higher levels, such as self-assurance and self-actualization, which make them work more efficiently, with more drive and more innovative ideas. Toyota builds upon these human needs and integrates a concept called “Toyota Kata” which is building habits for continuous improvement (Rother, M., 2010)....   [tags: Maslow's hierarchy of needs, Employment, Goal]

Research Papers
1364 words (3.9 pages)

The Analytical And Social Process Criteria Of Deliberative Meeting Essay

- ... 2.0 because they would need to attend a Slip Session with a counselor. During the session the Counselors Department will explain to the students how to improve their grade and if they need assistances with tutoring or have a disability the community college has accommodation for the students. “Identify both conventional and innovative solutions including governmental and nongovernmental means addressing the problem.” (Gastil, John, 2008 p.185) There was a complaint with a student; she was transferring to our college and wanted her transcript to be evaluated from a foreign country....   [tags: University, College, Community college]

Research Papers
1935 words (5.5 pages)

The Analytic Hierarchy Process And The Multi Attribute Utility Theory Essay

- ... Based on his study, MAUT can systematically measure both qualitative and quantitative factors and structure complex problems with a large number of criteria, attributes and alternatives. Despite AHP and MAUT have a number of advantages over other decision-making methods, they still have some shortcomings. Firstly, Since AHP presumes that the relative performance of attributes affecting the supplier’s performance is known with certainty; AHP cannot effectively take into consideration of risk and uncertainty in assessing the supplier’s potential performance [4]....   [tags: Decision theory, Decision making software]

Research Papers
1049 words (3 pages)

Importance of AHP
AHP is very useful when the decision-making process is complex, for instance, by being unstructured, it has been applied to numerous various fields (government, business, industry, healthcare, and education) and has proven to be a powerful decision-making tool.
In management, it has been successfully employed in resource allocation, forecasting, total quality management, business process re-engineering, quality function deployment and the balanced scoreboard.
In higher education, AHP has been applied in areas to include funding research support requests, deciding on sabbatical proposals, assessing performance and allocating rewards or compensation, choosing students for admission, financial aid, scholarships and awards, and faculty selection.
AHP is best used along with or in support of other decision making methodologies, example, when using a decision tree to analyze alternative choice nodes of a decision tree, as well as to derive priorities for alternatives at the extremities of the decision tree.
More so, because AHP helps capture both subjective and objective evaluation measures, providing a useful mechanism for examining the consistency of the evaluation measures and alternatives suggested by the decision maker thus it reduces biasness in the decision making process.
AHP allows organizations to decrease widespread pitfalls in decision making process, such as lack of focus, planning, involvement or possession, which eventually are costly distractions that can prevent the decision maker from making the right choice.

Are good decisions made by mishap or there is an inherent logical principle that the human mind follows when making decision? If there are implicit logical principles that the mind follows are they consistent and complete? There are no clear cut answers to these questions because in decision making humans are inconsistent and incomplete. The cognitive limitation decreases the prospect of analyzing all the alternatives for the decision situation. That is why the benefits of AHP can not be over stress by decision experts.
First the morphological way of systematic modeling the decision includes people to make explicit their unstated knowledge. This leads to people harmonize and organize their different feelings and understanding. An agreed upon structure provides ground for a complete multisided debate.
Second, in the framework of hierarchies and feedback systems, the process permits decision makers to use judgments and observations to deduce relations and strength of relations in the course of interacting forces moving from general to the particular and to make predictions of most likely outcome.
Third, the decision maker is able to incorporate and trade off values and influence with greater accuracy of understanding then they can use language to explain.
The final benefit is the decision maker is able to include judgment that result from intuition and emotion as well as those that result from logic. Reasoning takes a longtime to learn in most people and it is not an easy skill. By representing the strength of judgments numerically and agreeing on a value, decision makers do not need to participate in lengthen urging.

Even though AHP is one of the most widely preferred tools used in reducing complex decision to very comprehensible decision analysis, there are limitations in AHP concept.
Decision makers are humans that are inconsistent when making decisions. The human cognitive limitations make it very difficult for humans to evaluate all the available alternatives when making decision. The decision maker uses prior experience or information available to analyze the decision choice as a result limiting the consistency in the decision making process (the volume of information can limit the consistency).
Also, when the decision phase involves taking into account a variety of multiple criteria with evaluation based on a multiple-value choice, AHP splits the overall problem into many evaluations of lesser importance while keeping at the same their part in the global decision. This becomes confusing for the decision maker because they can not evaluate the true importance of the decision alternative.

This is an extensive discussion of AHP as a formal approach which allows decision makers to follow gradual and thorough steps in analyzing complex decisions. The approach decomposes a larger problem into is constituent parts dealing with rational concepts to choose the best alternative. AHP is a great tool that assists decision makers but it does not make the final selection of the best alternative(s) for the decision maker.

Ahmed, N., Berg, D., & Simons, G. R. (2006). The Integration of Analytical Hierarchy process and Data Envelopment Analysis In A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Problem. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 5(2), 263-276.

Grandzol, J. R. (2005). IR Applications: Improving the Faculty Selection Process in Higher Education: A Case for the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Retrieved Nov. 25, 2007, from

McCaffrey, J. (2005). . Retrieved Nov. 23, 2007, from

Yager, R. R. (1999). An extension of the Analytical Hierarchy Process using OWA operators. An Extension of the Analytical Hierarchy Process Using OWA Operators, 7(3), 401-417.
Return to